It isn't essential work in health to have an opinion about something so present in our lives as medical treatment. Living with my illnesses and cures offered me some learning about what is health, ilness and healing. Homeopathy develops a perception of the whole human being and numerous healing resources. And it produces tangible results. Some governments, groups and individuals accused homeopathy as not thorough and innocuous. I think it's unfair.
The argument most used by opponents of homeopathy claims that their drugs are the same as nothing. They called it a placebo, pure water or any name that means leading zero. Who says so does not know the principles of homeopathy or how their drugs works.
For homeopathy health should integrate mental/emotional/ physical plans. This integration takes place following a dynamism called homeostasis, which is a search for balance, wellness and maintenance of life.
According to George Vithoulkas it is the following:
"Cada organismo possui um mecanismo de defesa que está constantemente enfrentando estímulos, tanto de fontes internas quanto de fontes externas. Esse mecanismo de defesa é responsável pela manutenção de um estado de homeostase, isto é, um estado de equilíbrio entre os processos que tendem a perturbar o organismo e os processos que tendem a mantê-lo em ordem."
Homeopathy seeks to trace how each individual creates his disease process. Using some theories of modern science, homeopathy attempts to rethink the old concept of vital force:
According to George Vithoulkas:
"O que é o mecanismo de defesa? Como ele pode ser percebido? Quais são, precisamente, as qualidades que definem sua função nas diversas circunstâncias?
............................................................................................................................................................................................................
Há séculos, o ponto de vista predominante estava centrado na filosofia do "vitalismo", que postulava a presença de uma força vital dotada de inteligência e poder de governar miríades de processos envolvidos tanto na saúde quanto na doença. Parecia-lhes óbvio que alguma força animava o corpo humano, pois o organismo humano é mais do que simplesmente uma soma de seus componentes físicos. Alguma força ou princípio animador entra no organismo no momento da concepção, orienta todas as funções da vida e depois deixa-o quando ocorre a morte."
.............................................................................................................................................................................................................
A idéia de que há uma força vital inteligente que anima o organismo, podendo essa força vital ser um campo similar ou análogo ao campo eletromagnético, abre novas possibilidades para a terapêutica, passível de conduzir a uma era da medicina da energia."
The homeopathic remedy is planned to interfere in the magnetic field of the patient. It is remarkable that the homeopatic medicine does not act on the physical plane. Dynamization "break" the molecules of the physical substance until there is nothing material left, (but it keeps the energy). The claim that homeopathy "is nothing more than placebo", means that a remedy is not worthy to be called so if it does not act through chemical reactions on the physical plane. This sounds persecution. Why charging of homeopathy which is not its proposal? Homeopathy proposed its field of study and follows its principles and methods. Homeopathy has its own vocation and specific questions, is not accomplished, don't want to be a panacea and is liable to mistakes and hits as in all fields of knowledge. But homeopathy is not so grotesquely naive and untruthful to pretend that is medicine while distributes sugar pills.I am an admirer of homeopathy and science enthusiast. I think this is possible because science and homeopathy are not mutually exclusive ( although some people think so). I would like to make a peevish question even though the answer may occupy the space of a library. What is science? My modest contribution would say the following : Science is an inquiry about the nature and application of a methodology aimed at producing a systematic knowledge that can somehow improve the lives. I apologize for the simplicity of my answer but I know it does not cease to be adequate. Science is a present and as everything which is bright, produces some shadow areas. The shadow of orthodox science are the illusions of hope from a methodology much more than it can deliver. Methodologies are resources to aggregate the results of research into an organic whole and to provide screens to check the degree of coherence and functionality of these results. It's just a crop of the world, and it is more accurate, does not represent the whole.
All paradigms are cultural constructions that have more or less successful in interfering with nature . Nature does not submit any kind of control. It is bountiful and interacts with human intelligence lovingly donating knowledge we need to live and evolve.But it is sovereign to keep or to give the keys of their controls. So I wonder why a paradigm judges itself correct, or accurate or precise enough to understand nature in its infinite forms, relationships and events? A paradigm is a set of assumptions and methods that work to some extent for certain purposes. As a crop of the world can be very intelligent, well reasoned, well prepared and very productive. However, it's only a cut, without the power to reach the integral nature. This applies to all paradigms and world views, including homeopathy.
Where is the fragility of homeopathy?It's just habit of giving pompous names to placebos? A rudimentary practice that self proclaimed medicine? None. In fact, homeopathy is not as fragile as well. It only dared to follow its own paths. Its ideas about life, health, disease and medical practice, methodologies and strategies, opened unprecedent and came to conclusions that have a high degree of dissimilarity in relation to the predominant way of organizing knowledge.So it does not always confirm the current models.Quiet, lady "radical science", for which is different. The possibilities are endless. Nature is encrypted and nobody has access to its integrity. Pehaps humility is a widely accepted passport.
"The scince of homeopathy"
By George Vithoulkas
Nenhum comentário:
Postar um comentário